Interrogating Choice: Euthanasia and the illusion of autonomy
Before New Zealand passed the End of Life Choice Act by public referendum in 2019, Maxim Institute researched the experience of euthanasia overseas and the potential risks of the Act. We recommended a “no” vote.
Following the Ministry of Health’s 2024 review of the Act’s implementation, Interrogating Choice examines the quality of end-of-life choices now on offer. Does the system support patient autonomy, or merely the illusion of it?
This paper examines how New Zealand’s End of Life Choice Act impacts the reality of patient autonomy at life’s end. It highlights significant gaps in access to palliative care, weaknesses in safeguards, and the complexities that challenge true informed choice. The report calls for improved public awareness, equitable care, and stronger protections to ensure genuine autonomy for those facing end-of-life decisions.
What’s inside Interrogating Choice
• Recommendations to strengthen safeguards and oversight
• The inequities in access to end-of-life care
• Pitfalls in errors of diagnosis and prognosis
• The varied faces of coercion
• Growing threats to freedom of conscience for doctors and care providers