Submission to the Public consultation for the review of the End of Life Choice Act (2019)
Executive Summary
Maxim Institute believes the End of Life Choice Act lacks sufficient safeguards to protect vulnerable individuals from inaccurate terminal diagnoses, coercion, and inadequate mental health evaluations. Research shows terminal diagnoses predicting a lifespan beyond two weeks are often inaccurate, undermining the Act’s eligibility criteria. Additionally, the low rate of psychiatric referrals indicates a troubling reliance on medical professionals without mental health training. Safeguards against coercion are weak and subjective, as most applications are approved in less than two weeks, leaving little time to detect undue pressure.