Maryanne profile pic 2

Submission to the Public consultation for the review of the End of Life Choice Act (2019)

By Maryanne Spurdle September 27, 2024

Executive Summary

Maxim Institute believes the End of Life Choice Act lacks sufficient safeguards to protect vulnerable individuals from inaccurate terminal diagnoses, coercion, and inadequate mental health evaluations. Research shows terminal diagnoses predicting a lifespan beyond two weeks are often inaccurate, undermining the Act’s eligibility criteria. Additionally, the low rate of psychiatric referrals indicates a troubling reliance on medical professionals without mental health training. Safeguards against coercion are weak and subjective, as most applications are approved in less than two weeks, leaving little time to detect undue pressure.

MAXIM INSTITUTE

Submission to the Public consultation for the review of the End of Life Choice Act (2019)

Read the full submission
go back
Maryanne profile pic 2

Maxim Institute is an independent charitable trust that relies on the generous support of families, community groups, trusts, and individuals—without them, we wouldn’t exist.

We’d love to have you join our Community of Supporters. We need people like you to help us continue this work—and to grow it—so we can respond to today’s challenges and opportunities and help create a better future for the next generation.