Thomas profile_web

How to build political immortality

By Thomas Scrimgeour March 21, 2024

Politics is a quest for immortality. Every politician is faced with the eternal question—will what I build endure?

In Ozymandias, the English Romantic poet Percy Shelley eulogised the statue of a once-great king:

Nothing beside remains. Round the decay

Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare

The lone and level sands stretch far away.

He might well have been writing about New Zealand’s decisive rejection of Ardernism.  Christopher Luxon’s coalition has spent its first 100 days methodically euthanising the previous government’s flagship projects.

Nicola Willis and Chris Bishop championed a Labour government bill as a major step towards greater housing affordability in New Zealand.

One prominent victim of the election is housing policy. Labour’s most significant response to housing unaffordability was the 2021 Medium Density Residential Standards (MDRS): three dwellings, three stories. Realising that any intervention needed to last beyond their term of government, Labour magnanimously reached across the aisle to National and the law was passed by a supermajority.

Only Act dissented.

The then leader of the opposition, Judith Collins, said, “Today is truly a historic moment for New Zealand: a time when our two major political parties stepped up together to give Kiwis the right to build.” Nicola Willis and Chris Bishop championed a Labour government bill as a major step towards greater housing affordability in New Zealand.

Nearly two years and a leadership change later, Christopher Luxon announced at a public meeting, “I think we’ve got the MDRS wrong.”

The MDRS was secure as an enduring legacy of the sixth Labour Government.

Until it wasn’t.

Nearly two years and a leadership change later, Christopher Luxon announced at a public meeting, “I think we’ve got the MDRS wrong.”

Chris Bishop, the staunchest advocate for National’s involvement in the MDRS, is now tasked with producing its replacement.

Bishop’s alternative vision is more subtle than his predecessor’s but is all the more fraught for it. The MDRS was wide-reaching. It preferred intensification over sprawl, and it had limited carve-outs, running roughshod over much local decision-making. Bishop’s plan, by contrast, is agnostic on where and how the houses are built; councils just need to immediately zone for 30 years of growth.

At one level, this is a disagreement about two rival visions for an urbanist nation. Force intensification or allow sprawl?

The risk is that council autonomy results in a finessed definition of “30 years of growth,” which blocks development. Bishop points to financial incentives, such as GST sharing and his right to final sign-off as the minister, as reasons to think his approach will work. As ever, the devil will lie in the details.

At one level, this is a disagreement about two rival visions for an urbanist nation. Force intensification or allow sprawl?

However, perhaps the more important difference is the two rival visions of political immortality. Labour sought to achieve that in parliament, across the aisle. But that policy was subject to the whims of a new leader. Bishop’s route seeks security elsewhere. The new plan hopes that council participation, and healthy financial incentives, blunt the most serious opposition. This urbanism by consent runs the risk of interest group capture, undermining the housing reforms before the foundations are laid. But should he get the details right and excise the devil, Bishop’s housing reforms rest on surer ground. Indeed, they might just bring him what every politician seeks: immortality.

Listen to the podcast

Researcher Thomas Scrimgeour explains the thinking behind his column.

go back
Thomas profile_web

Maxim Institute is an independent charitable trust that relies on the generous support of families, community groups, trusts, and individuals—without them, we wouldn’t exist.

We’d love to have you join our Community of Supporters. We need people like you to help us continue this work—and to grow it—so we can respond to today’s challenges and opportunities and help create a better future for the next generation.