Danielle van Dalen

By Danielle van Dalen - 28/04/2020

Danielle van Dalen

By Danielle van Dalen -

Like what you're reading?
Share it around.

Or just highlight the part you like...

FAQ #8 | If we vote in favour of the End of Life Choice Act, is that going to be the end of the debate?

It is unlikely that proponents of assisted suicide will be satisfied with the End of Life Choice Act. As the report from the Justice Select Committee shows, many proponents of the End of Life Choice Act were insisting that the law be broadened to include more categories of people.[1]

International experience shows that the debate about who should be included in euthanasia and assisted suicide legislation goes on long after the initial Act has passed. Over time the law itself changes, and in doing so, the risk to vulnerable people is increased:

  • The Groningen Protocol, introduced in the Netherlands in 2005, now gives doctors and parents the right to determine if a baby’s life will be “worth living,” and euthanise them if not.[2]
  • The Netherlands have announced their intention to introduce a law to allow euthanasia for those aged 65 and over who are “tired of life” but not necessarily terminally ill.[3]
  • A Dutch ethicist, Berna van Baarsen, resigned her position in 2019 on the regional euthanasia committee “in protest at the growing role of advance directives for people unable to express their wishes.”[4]
  • There have been increasing numbers of euthanasia and assisted suicide cases on the basis of psychiatric conditions and early-stage as well as advanced stage dementia from the Netherlands, despite the disapproval of most Dutch psychiatrists to euthanasia for those with psychiatric conditions.[5]
  • The Belgian law was initially limited to those aged 18 and over, with a clause for children aged 15 and over who were emancipated from their parents. The law was changed in 2014 so that there is now no reference to age as criteria and children of any age can be assisted to die.[6]
  • In 2018, reports were tabled in the Canadian parliament considering expanding the law to mature minors, advance requests, and requests where a mental disorder is the sole underlying medical condition.[7]

Can we expect the same trends in New Zealand?

When looking at the experience, and especially the failures, of other jurisdictions, some may argue that New Zealand is somehow uniquely placed to resist these trends and failures. The reality, however, is that the proposed End of Life Choice Act contains no preventative measures that are significantly different from other jurisdictions that have evidence of expansion in the law and practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide.

We must learn from the experience of jurisdictions where euthanasia and/or assisted suicide has been legislated and acknowledge there is no reason to think the same trends won’t happen here. The continually expanding laws and practices in The Netherlands, Belgium, Canada, and even Oregon should give us reason to pause.

RETURN TO END OF LIFE | REFERENDUM SHORT CUTS PAGE

GO TO NEXT FAQ #9 -Can the End of Life Choice Act overcome the risks?

Authorised by J. Abernethy, 49 Cape Horn Road, Hillsborough, Auckland 1041


ENDNOTES:

[1] Justice Select Committee, End of Life Choice Bill: As reported from the Justice Committee, (2019) pp. 20-24, https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/sc/reports/document/SCR_86640/end-of-life-choice-bill, accessed 20/4/20.
[2] G van Loenen, Do you call this a life? Blurred Boundaries in the Netherlands’ Right-to-Die laws (London, Ontario: Ross Lattner Educational Consultants, 2015), 26-28.
[3] Government of the Netherlands, “Government scope for assisted suicide for people who regard their life as completed,” (12 October 2016) https://www.government.nl/topics/euthanasia/news/2016/10/21/government-scope-for-assisted-suicide-for-people-who-regard-their-life-as-completed , accessed 26/03/20.
[4] “Three euthanasia cases face investigation in Netherlands,” (The Guardian, 23 June 2019) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/23/three-netherlands-euthanasia-cases-investigated, accessed 6/4/20.
[5] “How Dutch Law Got a Little Too Comfortable with Euthanasia,” (The Atlantic, 8 June 2019) https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/06/noa-pothoven-and-dutch-euthanasia-system/591262/, accessed 6/4/20; “The troubled 29-year-old helped to die by Dutch doctors,” (BBC, 9 August 2018), https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-45117163, accessed 6/4/20; Regional Review Committees, “Annual Report 2018” (27 January 2020) https://english.euthanasiecommissie.nl/the-committees/documents/publications/annual-reports/2002/annual-reports/annual-reports, accessed 6/4/20.
[6] “Children’s euthanasia bill signed by Belgium King,” (RT News, 5 March 2014) https://www.rt.com/news/belgium-king-sign-euthanasia-bill-566/, accessed 26/03/20.
[7] Department of Justice Canada, “Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould and Minister Ginette Petitpas Taylor Table in Parliament the Independent Reviews Related to Medical Assistance in Dying,” (December 12 2018) https://www.canada.ca/en/department-justice/news/2018/12/minister-jody-wilson-raybould-and-minister-ginette-petitpas-taylor-table-in-parliament-the-independent-reviews-related-to-medical-assistance-in-dying.html, accessed 26/03/20.

Post Tags:
Danielle van Dalen

By Danielle van Dalen -

Like what you're reading?
Share it around.

Or just highlight the part you like...

Suggested Reading

Want to know more about Maxim Institute and what we do?

Find out more

SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER FOR UPDATES FROM THE MAXIM TEAM

FORUM (monthly eNews)Event Invitations